Archive for August, 2007

Value creation by opportunity cost

Saturday, August 25th, 2007

I was thinking about Tivo earlier. While it’s no rocket science product, it certain has become a common standard in households in the US now. In fact, Tivo has achieved the status of Google in the sense that people now use it as a verb. How many times have you heard, “I tivo’d that show”, “I will tivo that movie tonight”, “wanna come over, I have that game tivo’d”?

Anyway, I just thought it was interesting to note that one of the ways Tivo creates value for its users, is by reducing/eliminating the opportunity cost for its users. Opportunity cost or economic cost, is the cost of something in terms of an opportunity forgone (and the benefits which could be received from that opportunity), or the most valuable forgone alternative (or highest-valued option forgone), i.e. the second best alternative.

For instance, if there were two shows on two different channels that will show at the exact same time. If you only had one TV, you must pick only 1 show to watch. Even if you had 2 TV’s, you can’t really watch both at the same time. So in the pre-Tivo and DVR days, you would pick the show you liked better. The opportunity cost for viewers would be that other show that they unfortunately could not watch. Tivo fixed that. And good for them, because this is a pain that customers were willing to pay in order to get rid of. Just as a contrast, there are plenty of problems that aren’t painful enough such that customers aren’t willing to pay for a solution.

I like problem solving, and am on the lookout for interesting ways to create value. This is one way, so from now on, I will keep my eyes peeled for opportunity cost problems that can be solved.

Inbox Zero

Saturday, August 25th, 2007

Merlin Mann of 43folders fame presented a talk at Google titled Inbox Zero, a productivity hack/treatment for people who live out of their inboxes. The talk is about an hour long, so I’ve written up here some of the points I feel are important and works for me.

Disclaimer: This is _obvious_ stuff, but sometimes we forget, and a reminder is always nice.

Respect yourself, spend time and attention wisely

For knowledge workers like myself, we don’t create value by the number of bricks we can carry with our arms. We process knowledge/information, and that’s how we create value for our companies. The two things that knowledge workers must understand and appreciate is time and attention. Both of which we only have a finite amount of, and both of which are our constraints to our productivity. The goal is to separate the wheat from the chaff, saying NO to the low value work so that we can say YES to the high value work. Procrastination and frittering time away in email, surfing the web and flipping TV channels aimlessly would be “low value” work (more like almost no value work).

Email is a communication medium, just like the telephone. Don’t focus on email itself, focus on the information in the email and process it. Hitting the send/receive button all day is “busy work”, made to think that you are doing work, but you’re not actually doing any real work.

Process information in email
Don’t read the email and do nothing! Do something about it. Process it when you check it. Mine the gold from your inbox, and throw away the empty husk.

Processing actions:

  • Delete (consume) or archive it (save for historical records)
  • Delegate or forward it to someone else (stuff that don’t apply to you, or better handled by someone else)
  • Respond now, or do that work now!
  • Defer (perhaps replying requires more time, or requires some work first)

Having a productivity system in place is important (and so is sticking to it)

We are what we frequently do
– Aristotle

Don’t leave email open the entire time, with distracting pop-up notifications. Check once every hour or few hours, live outside of email. *This doesn’t apply to customer service reps

Use a tool/system that just stops short of being fun to use, so that you don’t end up fiddling with it. Remember that the tool/system has to be good at capturing information, and recalling information.

The most dangerous animal to hunt of all

Friday, August 24th, 2007

An interesting thought by Paul Vixie that I stumbled upon while I was incident handling yesterday.

Basically he compares the botnet problem to the human health virus/bacteria problem. Medical antibiotics are great but viruses eventually develop an immunity towards it. Then we are forced to come up with something better. He says that minor incremental stopgap measures against botnet herders cause more trouble in the long run:

Annoying botnet handlers educates them. Don’t do that! Let them succeed at what they try, but watch their every move. Learn to predict what they will do next. Learn how they did whatever they’ve done. Learn who they are. Learn where they live, and where their money comes from. Let them have a wonderful, annoyance-free life, right up to the instant that the front door of their apartment is kicked in and the handcuffs go on. Don’t create more antibiotic-resistant superbugs. Don’t teach them how to be more careful next time, on a painless incremental basis.

Botnet herders are humans just like us, who can think and problem-solve. It’s true that the most dangerous animal to hunt of all, is ourselves.

Full post is here.

Google Maps fun!

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007

Cool stuff, Google has just lowered the barrier even further to mashing up Google Maps with any web page you have. All you do is go to Google Maps, pick your address, click on “Link to this page”, and cut-paste the HTML iframe code they provide you. Can it get any easier? Previously you had to register and get a Google developer API key and what not, and they were fussy about where the Maps could be placed, and so forth.

But now, you can cut and paste hassle free anywhere you wish! So here’s my first Google Maps mash into my blog. Here’s my favorite hangout place: Panera Bread. Why? Because it has a flat-rate coffee charge, and free electricity and wifi!


View Larger Map

Data suggests: More swings at the bat == higher success rate

Monday, August 20th, 2007

Wow, I just read this great post by Marc Andreessen — finding empiric data (true to Marissa Mayer‘s what-does-the-data-suggest style) to answer the flame-brewing question that has been circling: “Are older or younger people better at entrepreneurship?” I do no justice by just skimming here, so please read the entire post for the full effect.

For the impatient: In summary, the valuable lesson learned here from Dr. Simonton‘s research is that:

  1. Generally, productivity — output — rises rapidly from the start of a career to a peak and then declines gradually until retirement.
  2. This peak in productivity varies by field, from the late 20s to the early 50s, for reasons that are field-specific.
  3. Precocity, longevity, and output rate are linked. “Those who are precocious also tend to display longevity, and both precocity and longevity are positively associated with high output rates per age unit.” High producers produce highly, systematically, over time.
  4. The odds of a hit versus a miss do not increase over time. The periods of one’s career with the most hits will also have the most misses. So maximizing quantity — taking more swings at the bat — is much higher payoff than trying to improve one’s batting average.
  5. Intelligence, at least as measured by metrics such as IQ, is largely irrelevant.