Archive for the ‘startup’ Category

San Diego’s 1st SuperHappyDevHouse (SDSHDH1)

Sunday, July 4th, 2010

Update 7/11/2010: Coverage of the event from the Del Mar Times by Steve Perez!

San Diego’s 1st ever SuperHappyDevHouse was a blast and success! Special thanks to Erica and Richard for hosting the hackathon :) We had about 17-18 software + hardware folks (and one reporter! we have no idea how that happened). The venue was perfect, people brought snacks, drinks, lawn chairs, and we ordered pizza. Most of the attendees are not surprisingly, from the San Diego Hacker News meetup.

While the attendance was really great good for the SDSHDH1, I suspect that it would have been as much as 30% higher if the semester was in session as many of those who voiced interest are college students from the nearby UCSD. Below are some pictures and videos from the event. I’m already looking forward to the next one! :) Thanks to all who stopped by—”network effects” is key to having a fun SHDH ;)

SDSHDH1

SDSHDH1

SDSHDH1

Entrepreneurial Thought Leaders: Marc Andreessen

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

This is an awesome 1 hour video that I watched over and over just to make sure I absorbed all the points from the awesome serial entrepreneur himself—Marc Andreessen. If I had more time, I’d transcribe it.

Cecily’s Closet .org – for children with special needs

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

A special plug for my mentor, Rachel – a genuinely awesome person!

If you are in San Diego and know of any children with special needs (or their caregivers), please do let them know of this excellent resource: Cecily’s Closet (www.cecilyscloset.org)

Everything from “guerilla” tips and tricks on how to navigate the “landscape” as a caregiver, to winning a free room makeover for your special needs child .. you’ll guaranteed to find something of use to you.

RB @Evan William’s 10 rules for startups

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

So good I’m RB’ing (re-blogging) it. Just in case the original ever gets taken down.

#1: Be Narrow
Focus on the smallest possible problem you could solve that would potentially be useful. Most companies start out trying to do too many things, which makes life difficult and turns you into a me-too. Focusing on a small niche has so many advantages: With much less work, you can be the best at what you do. Small things, like a microscopic world, almost always turn out to be bigger than you think when you zoom in. You can much more easily position and market yourself when more focused. And when it comes to partnering, or being acquired, there’s less chance for conflict. This is all so logical and, yet, there’s a resistance to focusing. I think it comes from a fear of being trivial. Just remember: If you get to be #1 in your category, but your category is too small, then you can broaden your scope—and you can do so with leverage.

#2: Be Different
Ideas are in the air. There are lots of people thinking about—and probably working on—the same thing you are. And one of them is Google. Deal with it. How? First of all, realize that no sufficiently interesting space will be limited to one player. In a sense, competition actually is good—especially to legitimize new markets. Second, see #1—the specialist will almost always kick the generalist’s ass. Third, consider doing something that’s not so cutting edge. Many highly successful companies—the aforementioned big G being one—have thrived by taking on areas that everyone thought were done and redoing them right. Also? Get a good, non-generic name. Easier said than done, granted. But the most common mistake in naming is trying to be too descriptive, which leads to lots of hard-to-distinguish names. How many blogging companies have “blog” in their name, RSS companies “feed,” or podcasting companies “pod” or “cast”? Rarely are they the ones that stand out.
(more…)

Flame out or become a $1Bil business

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

VCs take a porfolio approach to managing risk; individual company is largely irrelevant because of diversification effects. In fact, one of my portfolio companies was once rejected by Sequoia because, “You’ll almost certainly build a nice $100 million business. But we’d rather have a riskier investment that either flames out or becomes a $1 billion business.” Thus the key metric is expected value.

Quotable quotes, from 21 Million Reasons For Mint To Sell via CloudAve.

I’ve blogged before about Vinod Khola’s video here (iinnovate’s interview), where in it he says one of the problems he notices in entrepreneurs is that they don’t dream big enough. Just recently Sarah Lacy wrote that the consensus of the recent TC50 panel is that nobody was “swinging for the fences“, everyone just playing it safe–basically dreaming small.

Sarah writes:

Here’s why this matters: Start-ups by definition don’t have the experience, market position, funding or resources to tackle obvious market opportunities. If what they’re trying to do makes clear business sense, a bigger, better-positioned company would do it. A start-up’s only edge is that it’s not built into legacy businesses and preconceived notions and can do something, well, crazy.

There are entrepreneurs somewhere building the next big companies. But it’s probably just a wonky side-project that no one—not even the entrepreneur himself—realizes is the next big thing. That’s who we need to drag on stage next year.

I agree, if it’s an obvious opportunity, someone’s already on it. We need more crazy people working on crazy ideas.

Vinod Khosla on problem solving: You don’t solve all problems before you jump into a new situation. You just believe in yourself, and say, “I’ll figure it out, one way or another”. Vinod had no idea how he was going to pay for fees and rent when he got accepted to the Stanford GSB. To me, this is the “leap of faith” advice entrepreneurs talk about. You just got to jump.